[ExI] Singularity as a complex adaptive system - What does the environment look like?
    hkhenson 
    hkhenson at rogers.com
       
    Wed Dec 19 03:03:30 UTC 2007
    
    
  
At 08:59 PM 12/17/2007, you wrote:
>bounces at lists.extropy.org] On Behalf Of hkhenson
>...
>
>...I am motivated to do so because I am a matter chauvinist.  I have a
>(probably irrational) dislike for putting my "state vector" through an
>optical fiber...
>
>Ja Keith but consider where that state vector is going thru now.
Getting there with half your packets missing has got to be worse 
problem than the airlines loosing your luggage.
>...In spite of my distaste for such a future, my honest estimate for the
>post singularity population of _physical state_ humans is zero.  :-(
>...Keith
>
>So why the sad face Keith?  Humans have some very interesting information
>content but we are a loooong ways from being maximized in information per
>unit matter.
I know it's heresy to say so here, but I am not even sure that's a 
desirable goal, at least not for humans.
>We can cut away major pieces of a human without significantly
>altering the amount of information therein.  Meat isn't such a great way to
>contain consciousness, but rather only the best way we currently know.  I
>suspect when we do figure it out, it will be the biggest AHA Insight we have
>ever enjoyed.  May we all live to see it.
Or die trying.
Keith 
    
    
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list