[extropy-chat] cryonicist living life in reverse

Stathis Papaioannou stathisp at gmail.com
Wed Mar 14 09:25:41 UTC 2007

On 3/14/07, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:

Of course "looking at them the right way" is a giant can of worms.
> > sequences of states congruent to a thinking, feeling being. About as
> > silly as Hillary Putnam's proof that rocks perform computations.
> Yes. You can interprent a random sequence in any way you like, shifting
> the burden into interpretation, not the sequence.

Yes, yes. There's not just the computation to consider, there is also the
observer or the environment. But what if the computation *is* the observer
and the environment, dreaming away with no external interaction?

Stathis Papaioannou
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20070314/dc33353c/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list