[ExI] Cold fusion: some new results.

[Joshua Cowan]

It's probably just me, but sometimes I feel like I should chant "fight, 
fight, Fight" while keeping an eye out for the principal.

:-)


>From: "John K Clark" <jonkc at att.net>
>Reply-To: ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
>To: "ExI chat list" <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
>Subject: Re: [ExI] Cold fusion: some new results.
>Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:18:23 -0400
>
>Benjamin Goertzel
>
> > Naturwissenschaften is a reasonably high-quality magazine,
>
>More respectable than Physical Review Letters if you believe that loony 
>list
>because it's not even on it; but American Scientist and Scientific American
>are, and they are just one step above Popular Mechanics. And I'm sure The
>Proceedings Of The Royal Society Of New Zealand is nice, but is it really
>better than "Physical Review Letters"?
>
> > with a respectable impact factor.
>
>Not only have I never heard of Naturwissenschaften I've never heard of
>"impact factor" either.
>
> >As for your bet: The problem is that, as discussed already,
> > the decision of certain leading journals to ban papers on
> > cold fusion
>
>BULLSHIT!
>
>I have never heard any journal state such a ban, the only ban they have is
>against crappy papers.
>
> > I figure a big enough breakthrough in CF would
> > overcome their bad attitudes toward CF.  I am pretty confident
> > a sufficiently large breakthrough will occur in the next 10-15 years,
>
>Why are you "pretty confident"? There was no big breakthrough in the last 
>15
>years, in fact there were no small breakthroughs, there was nothing, NOT 
>ONE
>THING. I have no reason to think the next 15 years will be one bit better.
>
>And won't anyone put their money where their mouth is?
>
>John K Clark
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>extropy-chat mailing list
>extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat