[ExI] Global Warming Skeptics as Interview Subjects?

[Natasha Vita-More]

At 11:16 PM 9/30/2007, JC wrote:

>In his discussion on the "Proactionary Principle" at the TransVision 2007
>conference, Max More alluded to his acceptance of Global Warming, based on
>his own reading of the evidence.  I would like to hear more about his
>thoughts, or read any papers he's written on this subject, since he has
>represented the Libertarian side of the Transhumanist movement for many
>years.

You are mixing politics with science and philosophy.  And this is 
quite a narrow-minded statement because Max represented much more 
than a "Libertarians side of Transhumumanist movement".  (I can see 
the WTA has gotten to you.)

Max has represented all sides of transhumanist but the religious and 
socialist side.

>If I'm mistaken about his remarks or the portrayal, then I apologize
>in advance.
>
>Can this be arranged Natasha?

You can call him yourself James.  In fact, you were supposed call him 
some weeks ago.

Best wishes,
Natasha

<http://www.natasha.cc/>Natasha <http://www.natasha.cc/>Vita-More
PhD Candidate, Planetary Collegium -University of Plymouth - Faculty 
of Technology,
School of Computing, Communications and Electronics, Centre for 
Advanced Inquiry in the Interactive Arts

If you draw a circle in the sand and study only what's inside the 
circle, then that is a closed-system perspective. If you study what 
is inside the circle and everything outside the circle, then that is 
an open system perspective. - Buckminster Fuller
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20071001/904adf19/attachment.html>