[ExI] QT and SR (was Re: Probability is "subjectively objective".)

[scerir]

> The point is that (by construction) once thingee A
> is measured, anyone measuring thingee B *which is
> outside the first thingee's lightcone from any viewpoint*,
> will necessarily find a single determinate result,
> without there being any hidden determining variables
> inducing that outcome.
> Damien Broderick

Actually you do not need a second observer.
A single observer is enough. He measures,
at position A, at time t0, the observable 'a',
then he measures, jumping into position B,
at time t1 > t0, the observable 'b'. Voilà,
he finds the weird correlation.

|---------|
|         |
|         *source of entanglement
|         |
|         |
|         |
|         |
|         |
|         |
B         A

Actually the nonseparability (between entangled states),
whose nature is *algebraic*, entails nonlocality, whose
nature is *geometric*. It appears to be a sort of abstract
code, pre-geometric, a-geometric, out of space-time.