[ExI] Fwd: [wta-talk] The Singularity - A Dissent
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at mac.com
Tue Jun 3 05:57:46 UTC 2008
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Samantha Atkins <sjatkins at mac.com>
> Date: June 2, 2008 10:56:20 PM PDT
> To: World Transhumanist Association Discussion List <wta-talk at transhumanism.org
> >
> Subject: Re: [wta-talk] The Singularity - A Dissent
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> In the possibility space of all AI's, there will be some that will
>> manage our affairs better than we could. But the two problems are how
>> to recognise which ones these will be, and how to prevent people from
>> building other AI's that they believe will further their selfish
>> interests. In the case of nuclear weapons only a few have access to
>> them, and it is obvious even to a stupid person how dangerous they
>> can
>> be. Neither of these things is certain about AI research.
>
> I am rather depressed to admit that I find worries about AGI much
> less compelling of late. The reason is that it seems more certain
> to me by the day that humans are far too relatively stupid and bound
> hopelessly by their evolutionary programming to pose much of a
> threat of any sort of real transcendence or building that which will
> transcend or is even the seed of such. We take too long to mature
> only to decay too rapidly. We spend most of our energies, even many
> of the best and brightest of us in exceedingly mundane activities
> and concerns. Even the best of us seem quite poor at consistent
> high quality thinking much less action on any significant scale of
> cooperating individuals. Our organizations, no matter how high-
> minded in stated intent, are mired in common monkey feces slinging
> to such an extent that very little of real value gets done or can
> get done. I am hoping it is a passing melancholy. But of late
> this is very sadly how this all too human world of ours looks to
> me. Perhaps it is only or mostly what I see in the mirror and
> perhaps harshly. Perhaps many live on a different level. But I am
> not seeing the evidence this is so and I would very much like to.
>
> - samantha
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20080602/b1467a77/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list