[ExI] Energy crisis solution
hkhenson at rogers.com
Tue Jun 24 01:35:06 UTC 2008
At 03:31 PM 6/23/2008, Stuart LaForge wrote:
>--- hkhenson <hkhenson at rogers.com> wrote:
> > I gave a talk on this concept at the International Space Development
> > Conference and a few days later to some Lockheed planners. It need
> > to be verified by other engineers but looks like a way out of the
> > world wide energy crisis. Done as a Manhattan type program it might
> > be constructing new capacity at 500 GW/year inside an 8 year period
> > at a cost in the same range as the Iraq War.
>Given McCain's sudden shift in rhetoric toward an appeal to America's
>creativity instead of sheer coercive force with regards to the energy crisis,
>it would appear you had a net positive effect, Keith.
I *really* doubt it. The problem is getting any attention on ideas
the come up from "the bottom." The better way to do power sats is
with a space elevator. To get there, however, needs attention on nanotubes.
I have tried for some time to get someone to take up a research
project to make carbon nanotubes by catalytic dehydration of tri
hydroxy benzine with a rotating enzyme. An alternate method involves
using liquid iron as a carbon solvent. No luck, and it's not for a
lack of trying to reach someone who talks to Al Gore or someone of that ilk.
It is easy to see why. Even at my exceedingly low level I frequently
get presented with ideas that have not been thought out or just plain
violate the laws of chemistry and physics.
PS. McCaine's $300 million proposal isn't likely to be collected.
More information about the extropy-chat