[ExI] Free Will vs. Determinism
citta437 at aol.com
citta437 at aol.com
Fri Mar 14 23:45:58 UTC 2008
Kevin: "I think one mistake to make on this question is to suppose that
it's a
metaphysical (or, in some contexts, religious) question. The problem of
free will isn't going to be solved by armchair speculation. Rather,
it's a
scientific question: the question being, how do we explain human
volition?
It's a problem of neuroscience and what we need is a lot research in
how the
brain works.
________
Its not a scientific question but a mistake in thinking that free will
exist.
Kevin: "But, we can at least define the problem. At any moment, we can
conceive
multiple courses of action that we can take, yet we only actually
*take* one
of them. What determines our chosen course of action?"
___________
Genes determine one's nature/behavior in response to environmental
stimuli. It determines the brain structure, the color of your skin,
eyes and your sex from birth. Religion invented the idea of free will
to factor in ideas of sin and immorality. It is a thought on top of
thoughts.
Kevin: "is our volition or will that determines our course of action
really isn't
sufficient, because volition isn't a clear and distinct idea. Rather,
it is
at best a placeholder for an explanation: it's a word we use to signify
an
explanation that is missing. The free will problem can be summed up as
the
question: what exactly is the will?"
____________
"Will" denotes some state of being in the future. The problem is who
knows what the future Is? If no one knows the future, why cling to the
thought of a free being? No one is neither free nor not free.
Terry {Zen Practitioner}
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list