[ExI] an aboriginal human from 70,000 B.C.

[citta437 at aol.com]

MB writes: "In the USA, IIUC, missionaries
were
often sent to start schools and remove the children from their native 
culture
and
convert them. The children (from what I've read) were not permitted to 
speak
their
native tongue, nor wear their native clothing, nor learn their native
history/arts/culture/religion.

Did that work "better"?

What is "better"? From what point of view? Perplexing.

Or perhaps all that is Political Correct Speak about the Evil White 
Men. ?

Regards,
MB
_____________

A perplexing thought, indeed. Why so? The desire to change arise from 
ignorance/misperception. What works is the movement of the mind/brain 
moment to moment without a thinker or a controller, a permanent being.

The only thing that is permanent in our universe is change. Who control 
change? Can the eye see the eye?

Change is a process of interdependencies of the four forces of nature. 
The holy grail is to unite the gravitational force with quantum 
mechanics. We are not there yet as some cryonics said it would take 500 
years to do that. I won't bet on such a theory if you call it a theory.

A theory like gravity is a working hypothesis. We don't see gravity but 
can see the effects of that force as seen by direct observation. So far 
the four forces of nature work in our four dimentional universe 
including time. Time as a moment to moment change that's us.

Terry