[ExI] Arthur C. Clarke dies
Damien Broderick
thespike at satx.rr.com
Sun Mar 30 03:25:23 UTC 2008
At 06:48 PM 3/29/2008 -0400, JKC, no e, wrote:
>I'm sure that Arthur would be amused at the
>coincidence that on the very day he died for the first time in human
>history a Gamma Ray burst occurred that was so bright that a human
>being could detect it with his naked eye, something that occurred
>halfway across the universe 8 billion years ago. It is by far the
>most distant object a human being could see with his naked eye.
>Nobody, absolutely nobody, could have stage managed
>Arthur C. Clarke's death more skillfully. I am impressed.
Denis Overbye was, too, in the NYT on Tuesday:
<In the kind of coincidence that would have
delighted Clarke and set his fictive powers
going, a new star appeared briefly on Wednesday
morning, visible to the naked eye, in the
constellation Boötes. It was the remains of a
cataclysmic explosion, a gamma-ray burst, that
must have torched a galaxy seven billion
light-years away, around the curve of the cosmos, as Clarke might have put it.
Nobody knows if there could have been somebody or
something living there, when the universe was
half its present age. When I heard about it I
couldnt help thinking about Clarkes Jesuit and
the star of Bethlehem. Whoever or whatever was there now belongs to the ages.
Darkness has now reclaimed that spot in the sky.>
Great minds, and all... :)
Damien Broderick
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list