[ExI] Fw: Re: Google funding opportunity

[Damien Broderick]

At 09:19 PM 10/9/2008 -0700, Anna Taylor wrote:

> >> <wingcat at pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >> Well, that's certainly possible in the first
> >> round, but the second round is open to public voting.
>
>Really.  What would make the second round winner the best?

What?

> >> that doesn't spell its message out simply is probably
> >> doomed.
>
>Really.  If I don't get my message clear the second time around i'm doomed? :)

What?

> >> I wonder about the chances of any entry that does not
> >> have an "optional" YouTube video attached, for example.)
>
>Well, I guess that someone that has had an "optional" YouYube video 
>attached is doomed:)

What?

You're not Sarah Palin's syntax coach, by any chance?