[ExI] Crying "fire" in a crowded theater: Rothbard's view
stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 19:19:58 UTC 2009
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM, painlord2k at libero.it
<painlord2k at libero.it> wrote:
> For example, people could give up a collateral when accepting to serve in
> the local militia. If they don't show up to serve when a call is done, they
> forfeit the collateral that will be divided between the people showing.
> Something like his home.
> In the case of Schenck v. United States this would become a breach of
> contractual duties.
As little as an (anarco-capitalist? radical libertarian? minarchist?)
I may be, I must confess that I am often positively awed by the
creative effort of the relevant environment towards lateral thinking,
thinking-out-of-the-box and radically consistent solutions
Something which might well explain why they are over-represented in
the transhumanist ranks in comparison with the "outside world".
However, as per our recent discussion, what exactly the issue at hand
has to to with the list topics?
More information about the extropy-chat