[ExI] Wernicke's aphasia and the CRA

[Anders Sandberg]

Gordon Swobe wrote:

> > Some of Searle's critics argued that the man in the room represents a neuron or some other small part of a larger system and that his lack of understanding means nothing -- after all he's not the system and perhaps the system has understanding. Searle replied "Fine, let the man internalize the entire room."
> >   
>   

How does Searle take Clark and Chalmer's extended mind concept?

(My guess: he doesn't believe in it)


-- 
Anders Sandberg,
Future of Humanity Institute
Philosophy Faculty of Oxford University