[ExI] call for help
sam micheal
micheals at msu.edu
Tue Jan 13 12:20:13 UTC 2009
Back in '95 when I did my paper research on AI and machine
consciousness, I arrived at a model that does not differ extensively
from the one in my recent paper on ACOMAS which can be found at:
http://www.msu.edu/~micheal/acomas/
Now, after careful reconsideration, I arrive at the same two problems I
faced at that time: specifications of 'visualization register' and
'register feed'.
Consider the qualities of human capability of those things: we can
dream; we can imagine; we have an emotional 'pool' which drives many of
our thoughts and behaviors. But by design, ACOMAS will have no emotions
nor emotional capability (at this point, I refuse to give that construct
emotional capability in order to understand how much emotions drive us -
and - in order to 'free' that construct from our emotional 'failings'
(again, our predisposition to let our emotions 'drive' us and control
our behaviors)). Night dreaming (as opposed to day dreams) is a
wonderful illustration of our visualization capabilities. Part of our
brains manufacture the dreams we experience. Another part experiences
it. But it's as if we have a 3D projector in our minds that show us a 3D
movie. This is an extraordinary capability not easily modeled or simulated.
The main reason it is difficult is because it is not easily amenable to
conventional symbol conceptualization. The rest of the ACOMAS model is
fairly amenable symbolically (because the components are symbol based)
except for the senses .. So in this context, the senses and
visualization register will have to be modeled and simulated on a
completely different kind of technology (not based on conventional
symbols). A virtual reality is not what I'm talking about (even though
there may be similarities between VR and dreams). A "3D retina" is
closer to what I'm asking for. Any objective specific constructive
suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Now back to 'register feed'. What I mean by this is the following. We,
as human beings, have no problem to identify our motivations or why we
"think a particular thought" - because we have feelings, desires, and
dreams. ACOMAS will have no such benefits/attributes. Any feelings,
desires, or dreams - we will "program" into ACOMAS. (How sad.) We could
randomly feed its registers with random "thoughts" or "action plans" but
that would not be very helpful to ACOMAS or the project. It would
probably also invalidate its identity and confuse the hell out of it!
(Imagine if someone had the power to fill your mind with random thoughts
- it would probably drive you insane!)
So, what do we put in its registers? The prioritized goal list? That
again defeats the purpose of the device. The purpose of ACOMAS is to see
if "it can be done" (and how it might be done). If we give it this
incredible capacity for original thought - yet put repetitive or
unoriginal thoughts 'in its mind', we doom the device to be merely a
plaything or curiosity. I contend both the visualization register and
feed for registers can be creatively constructed so that machine
capacity is not less than human capacity. (If I can scientifically
imagine it, it can be built.)
So, if any of you dear readers have any objective specific constructive
suggestions for visualization register or register feed (that is not
emotion based), please don't hesitate to post on the forum or write to
me directly.
Sam Micheal
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list