[ExI] Power satellite draft analysis
dan_ust at yahoo.com
Wed May 20 13:34:21 UTC 2009
--- On Tue, 5/19/09, hkhenson <hkhenson at rogers.com> wrote:
> As some of you know, I have been
> working on power satellites as a way to solve the energy and
> carbon dioxide problems for more than a year.
> This last weekend I gained access to some hundreds of
> man-years of related work. With that, some relatively
> simple physics, and a spread sheet, I now have a rough
> analysis of the finances good enough for a draft business
> The analysis makes the case for solving both problems by
> undercutting the cost of energy from oil, coal and
> nuclear. In addition, it makes money on a scale large
> enough to put a dent in the US national debt. This on
> an investment of only two GM bailouts.
> The background information isn't public and in any case not
> many can understand the physics and finantial analysis
One thing to do -- not meant as an insult and not being snarky -- is spell check! If you want people to invest millions or billions, make sure all these seemingly unimportant problems are minimized. Er, "finantial" should be "financial."
> If you do understand at this level, will actually study and
> comment on it and agree not to make the background
> information public let me know and I will send you the
How big is "the package"? (No pun intended.:)
More information about the extropy-chat