[ExI] [ieet] Singularity - Non-Gender Specific

[Damien Broderick]

On 9/29/2009 4:03 PM, natasha at natasha.cc wrote:

>> You must be saying something
>> deeper than that.
>
> Far deeper, yes. I think my original post alludes to this.

I didn't see there an answer to:

Can you give some examples of phallic singularitarianism? What currently 
is "gender specific in its promotion"?

I do see, and agree with, your comment that "cyborg" has been 
appropriated by feminist and other poststructuralist theorists. What's 
the equivalent you have in mind?

Damien Broderick