[ExI] Who is safe?
bbenzai at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 25 11:46:04 UTC 2010
"spike" <spike66 at att.net> may or may not have asked:
"There is no clear end to that line of reasoning, no point where still more
transparency becomes cumulatively harmful. Or does it work like a
transparency Laffer curve, where there is somewhere an ideal level of
transparency? If so, we could have info-liberals who favor more
transparency than we have now, and info-conservatives, who favor less, and
info-libertarians who think all information wants to be free, and info
totalitarians who think Wikileaks and the whole internet thing should be
regulated or shut down, and info-hypocrites who want the other guy exposed
while keeping her own secrets, and info-(?) who hide among a jungle of false
information or intentionally create doubts about the veracity of their own
history. What would that be called?"
As in, spiking information with disinformation, as per Spike's suggestion.
More information about the extropy-chat