[ExI] Max More - New CEO Alcor Life Extension Foundation
eugen at leitl.org
Mon Dec 27 10:48:08 UTC 2010
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 03:04:20PM -0800, Adrian Tymes wrote:
> TL,DR: "Waaah! Society hasn't accepted cyronics yet so it never
It doesn't sound like you've read it.
> This analysis does not seem credible. Just to quote slide 31, it states
Do you know who's the author?
> that cyronics:
Your comments would be a lot more credible if you'd know
how to spell cryonics.
> * Mandates a complete change in reproduction
> Nope. No change in reproduction is necessarily linked. (Potential
> population increases can be dealt with in other ways, and that's a
> topic that exists even without cryo.)
> * Perturbs generational succession
> Not for a long time - until regenerative medicine has increased to
> the point where this perturbation is being dealt with anyway.
> * Requires Space Colonization
> Hardly. It's possible, with better - if "mundane" - agricultural and
> housing technology to dramatically increase the number of humans
> living on the Earth's land masses, and that's not even getting into
> aquatic colonization..
> * Requires (and supports) profoundly disruptive technologies:
> cloning, regenerative medicine, nanotechnology, AI
> Only regenerative medicine is necessarily linked - though that might
> in turn support cloning. Nanotechnology is only linked through the
> fact that anything biotech is arguably "nanotechnology", but that's
> an abuse of the term. AI is not necessarily linked at all (save
> through uploading - which could happen with or without cryo).
> * Ends the Species: Enables Transhumanism
> Again, no. Regenerative medicine might enable it, but A might
> cause B might cause C is a tenuous chain. (A = cryo, B = reg.
> med., C = transhumanism)
> The rest of this - I stopped reading a bit under halfway through
> part 1, after seeing fallacy upon fallacy upon fallacy. Perhaps Max
So you made it halfway through part I, latched up some random
comments, and then kindly offered a tl;dr.
Wall, yeah, Mike didn't write that for stupid people.
> should read this, though, as practice for the kind of arguments he's
> going to have to debunk repeatedly.
You're a part of the problem, then.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat