[ExI] heaves a long broken psi

Stefano Vaj stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Sun Jan 24 21:01:16 UTC 2010


On 24 January 2010 15:43, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:
> Or you can keep analysing the guesses, matching the one before or the
> one after, or last weeks guesses with this weeks tests, etc. etc.
> desperately thrashing around until you find something that you could
> call psi.  I call it random. That's why the tests are not repeatable.

My assumption is of course that they in fact are.

More or less as double-blind drug test, even though with a much lower
discrepancy (say, 0,0001% more guesses than would be warranted by
statistics?) and an even lower consistency from one study to another.
But pointing in the same direction.

But hey, I never played the "guess-the-card" game myself nor do I
claim to have actually performed any metastudy... I simply take Damien
and other people having examined the issue more in depth at their
word.

Much more perplexing and anedoctical sound the stories about drawing
the blueprints of a foreign secret base, etc.

-- 
Stefano Vaj



More information about the extropy-chat mailing list