[ExI] atheists de-baptize unbelievers:

Giulio Prisco giulio at gmail.com
Wed Jul 21 18:13:18 UTC 2010

I also think it was intended in the informal sense of "likely", but I could
not resist the temptation to say something bad about them;-)

Giulio Prisco
giulio at gmail.com

On Jul 21, 2010 7:54 PM, "Dave Sill" <sparge at gmail.com> wrote:

2010/7/21 Giulio Prisco <giulio at gmail.com>

> However, I wish to note that the word "probably" used in this context
> ["There's probably no God."] reveals a poor understanding of the notion of
> probability in its rigorous Bayesian sense, and thus a poor understanding of
> much of modern science.

Why do you think that? Do you think "probably" was intended to mean "its
rigorous Bayesian sense" in that case? Seems likely to me that it was meant
in an informal sense, e.g., synonymous with "likely".


extropy-chat mailing list
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20100721/d3856f33/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list