[ExI] transhumanist as a philosophy

[Giulio Prisco]

We do have major texts. But they propose different interpretations of
transhumanism, fundamentally compatible (I think) but with important
differences in interpretation and focus.

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:

> a perspective, a set of interpretative principles and principles of action,
> tends be regarded as a *formal philosophy* only after it has been canonized
> in one or more major texts.