[ExI] Cryonics is getting weird

[samantha]

Dave Sill wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:32 AM, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I know the law is the law, but what was Alcor thinking?
>>     
>
> I think they're primarily making the point that you can't block them
> from doing their thing simply by delaying the process. They're also
> doing what they contractually agreed to do.
>   

No.  They agreed to cryonically preserve his brain to the best of 
current art.  That brain is now useless mush.  This is the equivalent to 
digging up a corpse because you agreed to marry the person before their 
untimely death.  It is gruesome slime smeared on cryonics.  I do not 
consider this a "victory" in the slightest.

- samantha

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20100517/550d85d2/attachment.html>