[ExI] Machine Intelligence Survey

[Anders Sandberg]

Brent Allsop wrote:
>
> That was very fascinating information.  It would sure be fun to make 
> something like this more dynamic, and increasingly comprehensive, i.e. 
> it'd be fun to be able to participate, and see others I know included.
We have been thinking of doing an extended version, likely aimed at top 
academics but maybe also with a public side (one interesting question is 
after all what different groups think - we didn't see any difference 
among our crowd, but surely there is a difference between different 
communities).


>
> Towards that end, I've created a canonizer.com survey topic and 
> started a camp of my own, for your milestones question number 4 here:
>
> http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/121

Cool! I'll show it to the others at the institute.


>
> It'd be great to expand such survey's, make them much more 
> comprehensive, and track where everyone is as ever more scientific 
> data comes in, and be able to use such material as very convincing 
> educational references for others on such important still theoretical 
> topics.
>
> Anders, would you be interested in cross linking your survey back to 
> this, so perhaps any others interested in participating in the future 
> my be aware of this possibility at canonizer.com?

I'll try to do that (not entirely trivial due to the website bureaucracy 
in Oxford), but it seems a worthwhile project.


-- 
Anders Sandberg,
Future of Humanity Institute 
James Martin 21st Century School 
Philosophy Faculty 
Oxford University