[ExI] Watson On Jeopardy

Kelly Anderson kellycoinguy at gmail.com
Fri Feb 18 07:16:33 UTC 2011

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 06:21:26PM -0700, Kelly Anderson wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Samantha Atkins <sjatkins at mac.com> wrote:
>> > On 02/16/2011 10:15 AM, spike wrote:
>> > Not the same problem domain or even all that close.  Can you turn it into a
>> > really good chatbot?  Maybe, maybe not depending on your standard of "good".
>> >  But that wouldn't be very exciting.    Very expensive way to keep folks in
>> > the nursing home entertained.
>> Samantha, are you familiar with Moore's law? Let's assume for purposes
> Kelly, do you think 3d integration will be just-ready when
> CMOS runs into a wall?

Perhaps, perhaps not. But I think ONE out of the several dozen
competing paradigms will be ready to pick up more or less where the
last one left off.

> Kelly, do you think that Moore is equivalent to system
> performance? You sure about that?

No. Software improves as well, so system performance should go up
faster than would be indicated by Moore's law alone would indicate.


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list