[ExI] sexy news anchors distracting

[Darren Greer]

>Hey wait a minute, You found her distracting? <

No, not the female. There was a male counterpart version. I remember once
tuning in to the naked chef, but found it to be false advertising.

2011/1/26 spike <spike66 at att.net>

>
>
>
>
> *…* *On Behalf Of *Darren Greer
> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] sexy news anchors distracting
>
>
>
> Spike wrote:
>
>
>
> >>This one says sexy news anchors are distracting, when of course exactly
> the opposite is true..<
>
>
>
> >…There was a short-lived program called "Naked News" on some network in
> the U.S. a dozen years ago with anchors delivering lead-ins in nothing but
> their bare skin…
>
>
>
> WHAT?  Short lived?  Did it die?  Damn this IS a sad day.  I assumed Nekkid
> News was still around.  I get clips in the email from friends on a regular
> basis.  I suppose if I listened to the actual story I might be able to
> determine the approximate time frame.  It is hard to do however.
>
>
>
> >… Saw it once. VERY distracting. In a good way…
>
>
>
> Hey wait a minute, You found her distracting?  {8^D
>
>
>
> Darren I was having lunch with a colleague a few years ago.  Our waitress
> was drop dead gorgeous.  We were both admiring her.  I said, “Hey pal, keep
> your eyes in your head, she’s my orientation, not yours.”  He said, “I’m
> only gay, not dead.”  {8^D
>
>
>
> I was laughing so hard at that comeback I could scarcely finish my lunch
> for fear of beer spewing out my nose.
>
>
>
> >… Anything that takes your mind off the murderous trivia of the evening
> news is jake with me. d.
>
>
>
> Jake who?   She told me her name was Jill on our last date, but it didn’t
> get far enough for me to determine if it was really Jake in a very
> convincing disguise.  I wasn’t distracted or anything:
>
>
>
>
> http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://style.popcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/27283.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.ourpoliticsblog.com/huhu/fox-10-news-anchors.html&usg=__i4GhVAJTxpAajrvK_CfF_DONClo=&h=600&w=800&sz=216&hl=en&start=0&sig2=MyzbIyuzCslHW9P1FR-t5A&zoom=1&tbnid=vrIS1twJqLXZ2M:&tbnh=151&tbnw=188&ei=7qFATa7iPIWCsQOfnYCyCA&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfox%2Bnews%2Banchors%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26biw%3D1054%26bih%3D685%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=463&vpy=319&dur=9720&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=104&ty=100&oei=7qFATa7iPIWCsQOfnYCyCA&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=16&ved=1t:429,r:8,s:0
>
>
>
> It is difficult to understand why we still need news in either hard copy or
> audio copy.  Why?  We have computers now, what is the other for?  How does
> it help us?  Audio/video news has evolved into a form best described as the
> softest core pornography known, the only form of pornography still
> considered completely legitimate even by the church ladies.
>
>
>
> It’s a hell of a world we live in, ja?
>
>
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>


-- 
*"It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard everyone would do it. The
'hard' is what makes it great."*
*
*
*--A League of Their Own
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20110127/ca2ea265/attachment.html>