[ExI] sexy news anchors distracting

[spike]

. On Behalf Of Darren Greer
Subject: Re: [ExI] sexy news anchors distracting

 

Spike wrote:

 

>>This one says sexy news anchors are distracting, when of course exactly
the opposite is true..<

 

>.There was a short-lived program called "Naked News" on some network in the
U.S. a dozen years ago with anchors delivering lead-ins in nothing but their
bare skin.

 

WHAT?  Short lived?  Did it die?  Damn this IS a sad day.  I assumed Nekkid
News was still around.  I get clips in the email from friends on a regular
basis.  I suppose if I listened to the actual story I might be able to
determine the approximate time frame.  It is hard to do however.

 

>. Saw it once. VERY distracting. In a good way.

 

Hey wait a minute, You found her distracting?  {8^D  

 

Darren I was having lunch with a colleague a few years ago.  Our waitress
was drop dead gorgeous.  We were both admiring her.  I said, "Hey pal, keep
your eyes in your head, she's my orientation, not yours."  He said, "I'm
only gay, not dead."  {8^D  

 

I was laughing so hard at that comeback I could scarcely finish my lunch for
fear of beer spewing out my nose.  

 

>. Anything that takes your mind off the murderous trivia of the evening
news is jake with me. d.

 

Jake who?   She told me her name was Jill on our last date, but it didn't
get far enough for me to determine if it was really Jake in a very
convincing disguise.  I wasn't distracted or anything: 

 

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://style.popcrunch.com/wp-content/up
loads/2008/09/27283.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.ourpoliticsblog.com/huhu/fox-10
-news-anchors.html&usg=__i4GhVAJTxpAajrvK_CfF_DONClo=&h=600&w=800&sz=216&hl=
en&start=0&sig2=MyzbIyuzCslHW9P1FR-t5A&zoom=1&tbnid=vrIS1twJqLXZ2M:&tbnh=151
&tbnw=188&ei=7qFATa7iPIWCsQOfnYCyCA&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfox%2Bnews%2Banchors%
26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26biw%3D1054%26bih%3D685%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itb
s=1&iact=hc&vpx=463&vpy=319&dur=9720&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=104&ty=100&oei=7qF
ATa7iPIWCsQOfnYCyCA&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=16&ved=1t:429,r:8,s:0

 

It is difficult to understand why we still need news in either hard copy or
audio copy.  Why?  We have computers now, what is the other for?  How does
it help us?  Audio/video news has evolved into a form best described as the
softest core pornography known, the only form of pornography still
considered completely legitimate even by the church ladies.

 

It's a hell of a world we live in, ja?

 

spike

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20110126/bd11dcc0/attachment.html>