[ExI] Efficiency of algorithmic trading
Mr Jones
mrjones2020 at gmail.com
Mon May 2 17:49:46 UTC 2011
2011/5/2 spike <spike66 at att.net>
>
>
>
>
> *…* *On Behalf Of *Mr Jones
>
> *…*
> *Subject:* Re: [ExI] Efficiency of algorithmic trading
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Kelly Anderson:
>
> "You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
>
>
>
> >…I don't think the rich would be destroyed by having only 5 houses
> instead of 10. Or 10 cars instead of 20. Or 3 servants, instead of 10.
> …
>
>
>
> Right you are. The rich wouldn’t be destroyed, but the other seven
> servants would be, by unemployment.
>
>
>
> Their families would be destroyed by despair, hunger and alcoholism, which
> seems to hang around unemployment like an odor. What of the home builders
> of the other five homes, and the car builders of the other 10 cars? And
> their families? The DMV wouldn’t be destroyed, but neither would they
> collect their fees on the other idle cars. Tragic is this, for those cars
> would bring money to the state coffers while not be adding any additional
> wear on the roads or traffic because they are sitting still and quiet in a
> massive garage somewhere with one of the otherwise unemployed seven servants
> cheerfully waxing and maintaining it.
>
>
>
> Rich people are our friends. They help us all, even if indirectly.
>
>
>
> spike
>
Fair enough. When it's being used, it can at least be viewed in positive
light as you've just shown me. What good is $100Million in an off-shore tax
safe haven doing humanity?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20110502/9d36ecd5/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list