[ExI] Pistorius

Stefano Vaj stefano.vaj at gmail.com
Tue Jul 31 15:16:09 UTC 2012


On 31 July 2012 17:05, Dave Sill <sparge at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure what you're getting at. My statement above wasn't meant to
> stand up to legal scrutiny, but I think my intent was clear. By "natural"
> here I mean inborn.
>

Hey, running shoes are not "inborn", yet we allow them, don't we?

Moreover, in what sense the biochemical and structural make of an athlete,
which is deliberately modified to improve his or her perfomance, would be
inborn?

-- 
Stefano Vaj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20120731/535cd5d1/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list