[ExI] Eliminate people to reduce 'warming' and 'save Earth?"

[Stefano Vaj]

On 13 March 2012 23:51, The Avantguardian <avantguardian2020 at yahoo.com>wrote:

> The problem with reasoned arguments against procreation is that only
> reasonable people will abstain from procreating.
>

There a few marginal qualifications (eg, strategies based on either
relatively high or low parental investments are both Darwinistically
plausible, and are widely adopted across and within species...), but this
is the core of it.

Moreover, natura abhorret vacuum, and whatever resources are spared by one
genetic lineage are in principle exploited by another, not saved for the
future welfare of Mother Earth or whatever.

-- 
Stefano Vaj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20120314/21e33611/attachment.html>