[ExI] Warren Buffett is worried too and thinks Republicans are "asinine"
david
deimtee at optusnet.com.au
Tue Nov 5 21:22:01 UTC 2013
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 07:04:20 -0800
"spike" <spike66 at att.net> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> >... On Behalf Of david
>
> "spike" <spike66 at att.net> wrote:
>
> >> ... the ACA clearly specifically forbids the IRS from enforcing the
> penalties. They are
> > free to DEMAND payment, they can even send a bill. They just can't
do > > anything if the taxpayer just says no... spike
>
> >...Is there anything to stop the IRS simply applying whatever taxes
or > with-holding that you have paid, to the opt-out tax first, then
coming after > you boots and all for the "unpaid" income tax?
>
> -David
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sure, they can keep the refund you would have gotten. But if you do
your > withholdings right, you shouldn't have a refund coming anyway.
Or if so, it > should be very small. Here's the text:
>
> ''(A) WAIVER OF CRIMINAL PENALTIES.-In the case of
> any failure by a taxpayer to timely pay any penalty imposed
> by this section, such taxpayer shall not be subject to any
> criminal prosecution or penalty with respect to such failure.
> ''(B) LIMITATIONS ON LIENS AND LEVIES.-The Secretary
> shall not-
> ''(i) file notice of lien with respect to any property
> of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the
> penalty imposed by this section, or
> ''(ii) levy on any such property with respect to
> such failure.''.
>
> So here's the interesting part. Do they differentiate the normal
income tax > bill from that which is levied for not having health
insurance? I would > think they would need to keep those two bills
separate, since the IRS has > the authority to collect ordinary taxes,
but does not have the authority to > assess penalties for refusing this
one. So if they mix the two into one > bill, it might add the threat
of criminal sanction for not paying the > opt-out tax (specifically
prohibited by law) or it might cause the IRS to > lose its power over
collecting the income tax (which has some enormous > consequences in
itself.) >
> There are a number of waivers available for the opt-out tax: one of
the > major religions often found in places such as Saudi Arabia is
exempt, since > insurance is gambling. Presumably anyone who converts
to that religion now > is as exempt as the others. Native Americans
are exempt even though you can > buy a membership into some Native
American tribes without the actual > relationship, or just claim it, as
in the case of Elizabeth Warren. You can > be a union or a big
corporation, with the term "big" defined by how "big" is > the campaign
donation you offer. >
> You can be sure the IRS can and will keep your refund if you have one
> coming, but if you do, that is a bookkeeping error on your part. To
answer > your question, can they come boots and all. Yes to boots, not
to all. > Boots but not criminal sanctions, boots but not liens against
your property > or levies against your bank accounts. OK so what
happens when the mighty > much-feared IRS shows up boots and that's
all? The taxpayers now tweak them > with "I invoke the fifth
amendment" or say "Hey nice boots. Boots are made > for walking. Now
hit the road." >
> The IRS cannot do its job without a serious threat behind it. That
waiver > removed the fist from the glove.
>
> spike
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
Yes to "they will keep your refund", but that's not exactly what I
meant. If you have any tax liability at all they can collect.
For example assume your income tax should be $1000 and your opt out
tax $500.
You adjust your with-holding to be exactly $1000.
The IRS says "You have paid your $500 opt out tax and $500 of
your income tax. Now pay the other $500 under threat of
income tax collection penalties."
The only people immune to this are those who have absolutely no other
tax liability than the opt-out tax.
-David.
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list