[ExI] Smarter mice

[Adrian Tymes]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> If we can design an organic (and inheritable) gland/device to receive
> radio waves (or some other frequency) then what need have we of
> inorganics?  I do think it's likely the inorganic link will come first, but
> you are right - what evidence do I have?  Ha!
>

Consider also which one works better.  Biology is infamously messy, the
result of compromises and constraints of a certain production method that
is not an absolute requirement for future designs.  Computers and software
may be complex but they are, at some level, the result of conscious designs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20141211/e1914256/attachment.html>