[ExI] Climate models
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 30 22:03:10 UTC 2014
Seen today in the New York Times: artificial photosynthesis. How about
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Tomaz Kristan <protokol2020 at gmail.com>wrote:
> For now, gas and oil fracking is a nearly ideal solution. It's just great,
> what those people have done. We should thank them.
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Keith Henson <hkeithhenson at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:00 AM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com>
>> > I have to say all this doesn't exactly give me confidence that I should
>> > my life on the fact that although they make lousy 17 year predictions
>> > climate models make wonderful 100 year predictions.
>> It doesn't matter or effect what we should be doing one bit. Running
>> out of cheap energy is far more serious than climate. It will hit
>> sooner and cause more problems, including human deaths, than the worse
>> climate predictions.
>> What we need is at least one really cheap and abundant source of
>> energy. It can't be carbon based because there isn't enough left that
>> can be obtained at a low enough price. Ground solar and wind will not
>> do it because there is no apparent way to get the cost down low
>> Here is a dumbed down version of my thoughts on how to solve the problem.
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat