[ExI] Strong AI Hypothesis: logically flawed?

[Tomaz Kristan]

>
​Whatever number it takes to make up most of your forebrain.​


Really? How deep this forebrain goes? To the half of brain, or what?

Your view is of no use, utterly!.

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:30 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
>
>> How many cells must die, for me to die?
>>
>> ​Whatever number it takes to make up most of your forebrain.​
>
>
> ​Shades of Korzybski and Hayakawa and general semantics:  the map is not
> the territory.  It could be argued that all copies are flawed in some way.
> (Pratchett fans will see a parallel in the dwarf's holy hammer.)
>
> It used to be thought that neurons were never replaced and now that idea
> has gone out the window.  But do all neurons get replaced?  Dunno.  But
> perhaps the deterioration of them and partial replacement​ account for many
> memory errors over the years (though confabulation probably accounts for
> most).  bill w
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>


-- 
https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20141003/a69c5bff/attachment.html>