[ExI] Strong AI Hypothesis: logically flawed?

[William Flynn Wallace]

If my views are of no use, Tomaz, why are you asking me questions you can
easily find with a Google search?  bill w

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Tomaz Kristan <protokol2020 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> >
> ​Whatever number it takes to make up most of your forebrain.​
>
>
> Really? How deep this forebrain goes? To the half of brain, or what?
>
> Your view is of no use, utterly!.
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:30 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> How many cells must die, for me to die?
>>>
>>> ​Whatever number it takes to make up most of your forebrain.​
>>
>>
>> ​Shades of Korzybski and Hayakawa and general semantics:  the map is not
>> the territory.  It could be argued that all copies are flawed in some way.
>> (Pratchett fans will see a parallel in the dwarf's holy hammer.)
>>
>> It used to be thought that neurons were never replaced and now that idea
>> has gone out the window.  But do all neurons get replaced?  Dunno.  But
>> perhaps the deterioration of them and partial replacement​ account for many
>> memory errors over the years (though confabulation probably accounts for
>> most).  bill w
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20141003/d8e89283/attachment.html>