[ExI] fermi paradox again, was: addiction
Henry Rivera
hrivera at alumni.virginia.edu
Mon Apr 6 23:18:21 UTC 2015
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:38 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> <anders at aleph.se> wrote:
>
> > You need 100% addiction, not 95% (and in humans, most things that are
>> addictive only for about 5%).
>>
>
> I'd like to know where the 5% figure comes from. I have to doubt that it
> applies to all areas of addiction and if it distinguishes between chemical
> dependency and psychological dependency. bill w
>
>
>
> Prevalence data on developing dependence are included in the attached
article. I've seen newer data from NIDA, I think, and it's basically the
same.
-Henry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150406/56db6128/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: From First Drug Use to Drug Dependence-prevalence.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 247992 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150406/56db6128/attachment.pdf>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list