[ExI] SETI for Post Singularity Civs
rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
Thu Jan 29 16:58:01 UTC 2015
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:48 PM, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:
> So far as we can see, ETs are not eating stars. So, as you say, either
> they don't exist, or are so incredibly rare that they are not in our
> area of the universe. That seems to indicate that intelligent life
> does not survive for long.
### There is insufficient data on that. Knowing a census but in the absence
of knowledge about the rate of formation of life, you cannot estimate the
rate of intelligent life disappearance.
> My attitude is called Hope.
### You should not let emotional considerations influence your estimates of
> The alternative is that intelligent life
> does survive, but it doesn't do what we (at our present stage of
> development) would expect. My suggestion of ETs hiding in deep space,
> in a virtual reality civilisation suited to their high speed thinking
> is only a hopeful survival path for ETs that fits the lack of evidence
> for their existence that we have.
### Indeed, if for some reason you assume lots of ETs are born, then given
visible evidence, they die soon or stay alive invisible, and I would agree
that staying invisible may be more aspirational than dying.
But why assume that lots of ETs are born? There is so far no strong
evidence to that effect.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat