[ExI] Why we are teaching science wrong, and how to make it right
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 17 00:08:43 UTC 2015
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Dan <danust2012 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2015, at 10:00 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Spike, education is very progressive, if you define that as getting into
> new things. Trouble is, the quality of the research they do is poor to
> very poor. I have been to educational research conferences to see some of
> my students present papers (as it is the easiest venue - harder at
> psychology conferences), and the level is just shocking (not the students,
> the professors/researchers). The questions after a paper presentation are
> almost always laudatory and hardly even critical. Of course I had to try
> to nail some of them on poor research and never got a good response.
> Mostly they didn't seem to know what I was talking about.
>
> So a lot of bad theory gets into classroom teaching when in fact they were
> better off doing what they were doing. They just love new theories and
> don't seem to care much about the backbones of it.
>
> I'd like to see some of what you found.
>
>
> I won't speak to Spike's claim about the military, but it seems like
> you're focusing on content -- what's taught -- rather than pedagogical
> method -- how it's taught. The article offered that the latter needs to
> change and that certain methods are much better at getting students to
> understand the content.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
Actually the bad theories I mentioned are about how to teach, not what
. I think K-12 teacher have little input into content.That is decided at
the state level.
They went through a period where they thought that different students
needed different methods: more visually oriented students need the visual,
and so forth. Turns out it really did not matter. Why did they not find
this out before they instituted it in the classrooms? Poor research. As I
have said, probably more than once, educators love theories. Vast amounts
of supporting data? Not so much.
bill w
Sample my Kindle books via:
> http://www.amazon.com/Dan-Ust/e/B00J6HPX8M/
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150716/30d54d3d/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list