[ExI] Existential Risks might be underestimated

[William Flynn Wallace]

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com> wrote:

> Again, I’d just like to point out there’s no proof more is not better.
>
> You can assert it is not.
>
> I hereby assert: More is better. The more humans the better. We don’t have
> nearly enough yet to even imagine what will become.
>
> We are still in the infancy of our sentience and haven’t even left the
> cradle yet.
>
> Tara Maya
>

​Define 'better'. I say we are polluting the planet far more than our
species is worth.​

​  Fouling our nest, as if we are the only things in the universe worth
anything.​

> Blog <http://taramayastales.blogspot.com/>  |  Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/taramayastales>  |  Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Unfinished-Song-Epic-Fantasy/310271375658211?ref=hl>  |
>  Amazon
> <http://www.amazon.com/Tara-Maya/e/B004HAI038/ref=sr_tc_2_0?qid=1349796143&sr=8-2-ent>  |
>  Goodreads <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2951879.Tara_Maya>
>
>
>
> On May 28, 2015, at 10:49 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> ​ More is not better…
>
>  Agreed.  I just don’t see a clear path to prevent it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150528/8a1a810a/attachment.html>