[ExI] Existential Risks might be underestimated
William Flynn Wallace
foozler83 at gmail.com
Thu May 28 18:16:53 UTC 2015
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com> wrote:
> Again, I’d just like to point out there’s no proof more is not better.
> You can assert it is not.
> I hereby assert: More is better. The more humans the better. We don’t have
> nearly enough yet to even imagine what will become.
> We are still in the infancy of our sentience and haven’t even left the
> cradle yet.
> Tara Maya
Define 'better'. I say we are polluting the planet far more than our
species is worth.
Fouling our nest, as if we are the only things in the universe worth
> Blog <http://taramayastales.blogspot.com/> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/taramayastales> | Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Unfinished-Song-Epic-Fantasy/310271375658211?ref=hl> |
> <http://www.amazon.com/Tara-Maya/e/B004HAI038/ref=sr_tc_2_0?qid=1349796143&sr=8-2-ent> |
> Goodreads <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2951879.Tara_Maya>
> On May 28, 2015, at 10:49 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
> More is not better…
> Agreed. I just don’t see a clear path to prevent it.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat