[ExI] Existential Risks might be underestimated

Dan danust2012 at gmail.com
Thu May 28 18:30:23 UTC 2015

On May 28, 2015, at 11:16 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com> wrote:
>> Again, I’d just like to point out there’s no proof more is not better.
>> You can assert it is not.
>> I hereby assert: More is better. The more humans the better. We don’t have nearly enough yet to even imagine what will become. 
>> We are still in the infancy of our sentience and haven’t even left the cradle yet.
>> Tara Maya
> ​Define 'better'. I say we are polluting the planet far more than our species is worth.​ ​  Fouling our nest, as if we are the only things in the universe worth anything.​

Is that the result of more humans or mistaken policies? 

Ever read the work of Julian Simon?


 Sample my Kindle books via:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150528/29d893a3/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list