[ExI] Existential Risks might be underestimated
tara at taramayastales.com
Fri May 29 01:40:34 UTC 2015
Sorry for my brusk reply earlier. I had this person confused with someone else. Working on a big project and need to stop peeking in at this list! I’ll try and give a more thoughtful reply when I can.
Blog <http://taramayastales.blogspot.com/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/taramayastales> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Unfinished-Song-Epic-Fantasy/310271375658211?ref=hl> | Amazon <http://www.amazon.com/Tara-Maya/e/B004HAI038/ref=sr_tc_2_0?qid=1349796143&sr=8-2-ent> | Goodreads <http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2951879.Tara_Maya>
> On May 28, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Dan <danust2012 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 28, 2015, at 11:16 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com <mailto:foozler83 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com <mailto:tara at taramayastales.com>> wrote:
>> Again, I’d just like to point out there’s no proof more is not better.
>> You can assert it is not.
>> I hereby assert: More is better. The more humans the better. We don’t have nearly enough yet to even imagine what will become.
>> We are still in the infancy of our sentience and haven’t even left the cradle yet.
>> Tara Maya
>> Define 'better'. I say we are polluting the planet far more than our species is worth. Fouling our nest, as if we are the only things in the universe worth anything.
> Is that the result of more humans or mistaken policies?
> Ever read the work of Julian Simon?
> Sample my Kindle books via:
> http://www.amazon.com/Dan-Ust/e/B00J6HPX8M/ <http://www.amazon.com/Dan-Ust/e/B00J6HPX8M/>_______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat