[ExI] R: Re: Cramer on impossibility of FTL communication
Adrian Tymes
atymes at gmail.com
Fri Sep 4 02:25:40 UTC 2015
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:37 AM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> 4) Some gears and pulleys so that each time the rotary switch is advanced
> one position the filter is advanced by 30 degrees. This is because it's
> been known for many years that the amount of light polarized at 0 degrees
> that will make it through a polarizing filter set at X degrees is [COS
> (x)]^2; and if x = 30 DEGREES then the value is .75
>
Here is where your analogy breaks. (COS(60)^2)/2 != COS(30)^2 !=
2*(COS(60)^2). So you can have full alignment at 0, 75% at 30 degrees, and
0 at 90; 60 degrees is neither 50% nor 25%. This is not a direct
consequence of quantum mechanics (save for the distribution of photons) or
hidden variables, but rather how cosine is a non-linear function.
Further, your original example assumes that because 12 o'clock and 2
o'clock differ by a certain amount, that 2 o'clock and 4 o'clock must
differ by the same amount. That does not have to be the case. If 12
o'clock represents perfect alignment with polarization, then 2 o'clock does
not represent perfect alignment. The lookup table for 4 o'clock can be
more different from 2 o'clock than 2 o'clock is from 12 o'clock.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150903/f72efddb/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list