[ExI] privacy again

[William Flynn Wallace]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Michael LaTorra <mlatorra at gmail.com> wrote:

> Speaking as a man, and wanting to get this in before any other guy
> comments about it, I don't want any man here to feel that he is being
> personally attacked. Not all men are stalkers. Not even most men. But the
> minority of male malefactors looms large for all women because they are SO
> persistent and are often REPEAT OFFENDERS. This fact was made startlingly
> clear to me through the research of Geoffrey Miller, who is a professor
> specializing in the evolutionary psychology of mating behaviors. The
> fraction of the male population who stalk and harm women is overrepresented
> in terms of their interactions with women. ALL women. So even though most
> men don't do this stuff, the men who do seem to comprise a huge percentage
> of the male population from women's point of view because they pop up often
> and everywhere in women's lives.
>
> I myself have called the cops on stalkers and wife beaters more than once.
> If you see something, say something. It's the right thing to do.
>
> Regards,
> Mike LaTorra
>

​Two things:  1 - we tend to blame psychopaths for these types of behaviors
and rightly so, but 2 - there are those who are madly in love with some
woman and want total control of her.  Also, if you can remember being madly
in love with someone, perhaps in your late teenage years or early 20s, it
is highly irrational.  You think that you own this person ('they are
MINE!').  Very obsessive in nature.  It is fated if only she would
understand that.  Well, I am not going to write a book about this, but
let's keep in mind that these men are small minorities of all men, so I
plead with women not to look at every man and assume that given certain
circumstances he could be this stalker or rapist or controller.

Yes, they are out there and be careful of men who tend to be glib and
charming and extroverted.  And liars.  OH well, I 'll stop.  bill w​


On Mar 10, 2016 8:05 PM, "PJ Ma
> ​ ​
> nney" <pjmanney at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the follow up.  This case was indeed not seemed worthy of
>>> research: it does not affect us or anyone we know of.  If the hotel did
>>> actively help the stalker, rather than passively and ignorantly allow as
>>> had previously been stated, then yes they deserved to lose every penny of
>>> that judgment, and more.
>>>
>> On the contrary: it does not only affect famous women. That was the
>> point. It affects 50% of the population and I'm sure you know quite a few
>> women who have been stalked. In fact, almost every adult woman by a certain
>> age has been, whether for short times as they are followed through the
>> streets or buildings, or for longer times, via communication and
>> technology. Read the comments on the second article. You will find women in
>> every walk of life commenting on how they were stalked while traveling for
>> business, like Andrews. Or just by living every day, surrounded by men
>> without empathy or boundaries. There are more of them than people think.
>>
>> PJ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160310/78d50d51/attachment.html>