[ExI] Open migration/was Re: Repudiating the national debt

[Rafal Smigrodzki]

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> ### Yes, by all means, you do need to make your country great, because in
> sick countries smaller communities are devoured by their neighbors.
>
>
> I'm not sure what that means.
>

### The Congo is a sick country. The Bantus rape and pillage the Pygmies,
the Pygmies kill Bantus. Constant violence, every tribe against every other
tribe, is the norm there. There is no place for anarchocapitalists there.

You want to keep your country great - free, orderly, high-trust, safe,
healthy.
 -----------------

> Open immigration of low-IQ and hostile people would dramatically lower our
> standard of living. Also, proximity + diversity = war.
>
>
> Note that you added hostile. Are most people hostile? Are most immigrants?
> Isn't it note that anti-foreign bias can be a driver here -- by being
> hostile to newcomers?
>

### Unassimilable immigrants often enough become hostile to the locals. The
world today is built on the bones of people displaced and destroyed by
hostile newcomers.

----------------------


> Also, low-IQ folks would also be much more productive in the West than in
> their native lands. The typical hypothetical of the <fill in the blank>
> moving to a Western city and becoming a cab driver and increasing their
> real income a ten-fold might hint at this. The actual numbers seem to show
> it's the case.
>
> ### Read Garrett's "Hive Mind". The IQ-70 immigrant will increase her
income tenfold but her children will lower average IQ of the society,
eventually bringing it down to the original expected value of the IQ-70
people.

Rafał
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160519/b239ce56/attachment.html>