[ExI] Observable Universe contains ten times more galaxies than previously thought
Anders
anders at aleph.se
Thu Oct 20 20:43:49 UTC 2016
On 2016-10-20 09:31, Ben wrote:
> Anders <anders at aleph.se> Observed:
> > Yes, this news is based on a very odd use of the present tense.
> > Astronomers may be fine with considering the "present" as the
> surface of our past light cone, but most of us prefer to consider the
> > unreachable volumes with the same cosmological time as us as being
> "now".
>
> Ah, but doesn't that contradict Relativity? I thought one consequence
> of that was that there is no such thing as 'simultaneity', over large
> enough scales. Surely anyone who wants to think about cosmology needs
> to get used to that idea?
Cosmologists are totally fine with a lot of temporal coordinate systems.
Cosmological time and co-moving time are pretty common ones, and they
make it possible to talk about "now" in regions outside our light cone:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.3823v1.pdf
Moving observers would see a different simultaneity, but since matter in
the universe are roughly static relative to co-moving space coordinates
this kind of simultaneity makes sense.
--
Dr Anders Sandberg
Future of Humanity Institute
Oxford Martin School
Oxford University
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list