[ExI] Fwd: 98% hoax

Rafal Smigrodzki rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
Mon Sep 5 01:06:56 UTC 2016

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:18 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>

> Do you want to convince her that there is anthropogenic catastrophic
> global warming?
> If yes, why would you try to convert a friend to a position, even if you
> are by your own admission not very familiar with its justification?
> Rafał
> You are correct - I used the wrong word - 'convince'.  What I want to know
> is just how the question stands now.  If Forbes is correct, that poll
> showing 97% agreeing with manmade warming is not valid.  Well, what IS the
> consensus of scientists on this point?  bill w

### I do not know that. The whole field of climate science is now so
thoroughly poisoned by politics that it I find it impossible to trust much
of what is being written. You would need to very critically read primary
sources and ask yourself what is the meaning of "manmade warming".

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160904/2a3f9ec8/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list