[ExI] Fwd: 98% hoax

[Rafal Smigrodzki]

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:18 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Do you want to convince her that there is anthropogenic catastrophic
> global warming?
>
> If yes, why would you try to convert a friend to a position, even if you
> are by your own admission not very familiar with its justification?
>
> Rafał
>
> You are correct - I used the wrong word - 'convince'.  What I want to know
> is just how the question stands now.  If Forbes is correct, that poll
> showing 97% agreeing with manmade warming is not valid.  Well, what IS the
> consensus of scientists on this point?  bill w
>

### I do not know that. The whole field of climate science is now so
thoroughly poisoned by politics that it I find it impossible to trust much
of what is being written. You would need to very critically read primary
sources and ask yourself what is the meaning of "manmade warming".

Rafał
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160904/2a3f9ec8/attachment.html>