[ExI] right to try bill

[William Flynn Wallace]

More precisely, the SCOTUS rules on which legal rights there are and what
the limits there are to these.

So, who knows what the limits are?  Tanks?  Machine guns?  Semiautomatic is
OK but full automatic not is my guess.

Spike, you are too cynical.  Take away right to bear arms even if they
could?  Nah.

bill w

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 5:03 PM, spike <spike66 at att.net> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* extropy-chat [mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Dan TheBookMan
> *…*
>
> >>…Had the congress the legal right to legislate away Americans’ right to
> bear arms, they would have done it a long time ago.
>
>
>
> >…Actually, until recent 2A rulings didn't the Congress and various
> legislatures do just that?...  Regards Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> Various legislatures can, the Federal legislature cannot.  States can (and
> some do) make it illegal for citizens to bear arms in that state.  This is
> OK, for their own state constitutions allow it, and states outrank the
> Fed.  Citizens can go to a different state if they don’t like it (and do.)
> But there can be no Federal level infringement on the right to bear arms
> because of amendment 2.
>
>
>
> In a time when this heavily armed (and crazy) nation is on the verge of
> electing one of two presidential candidates such as these, both of whom
> have expressed intentions of violate law and the one who already has while
> in office, aren’t you glad we have a second amendment?  Me too.
>
>
>
> spike
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20160925/5bb97ab4/attachment.html>