[ExI] letter

[William Flynn Wallace]

dan wrote - Not everyone take drama classes in college is going to earn a
living in drama, for instance.

Aw, c'mon - how much money does the drama dept. earn for the college?
Geez.  bill w

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Dan TheBookMan <danust2012 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Dec 15, 2017, at 7:40 AM, Dave Sill <sparge at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:22 AM, William Flynn Wallace <
> foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1.6% of college football players make it to the pros.
>>
>
> I think the same ratio also applies to other parts of the entertainment
> industry. After all, sports are entertainment. Not everyone take drama
> classes in college is going to earn a living in drama, for instance.
>
> So what?  So after perhaps making tens of millions of dollars for their
>> schools winning conference titles, bowl games, the vast majority of the
>> players graduate having gotten mostly nothing in return.
>>
>> It is time to pay the players.  Where else do we see employees contribute
>> a great deal to the organization's bottom line and get a pittance in return?
>>
>> The idea that they are amateurs is ludicrous.  Even the Olympic
>> organization got the right idea on that awhile back.  How much has Michael
>> Phelps put in the bank?
>>
>> It is not a question of having the money. It's a question of sharing it.
>> The players and coaches earned it.  The coaches certainly get their share
>> and their schools too.  The real money makers get next to nothing -
>> tuition, books, a very few spending dollars.
>>
>> This blatant hypocrisy needs to stop.  This is slave labor, isn't it?
>> Where else can they market their skills?  Nowhere.
>>
>> Outside of actual slavery, I can't think of another situation that is
>> this unfair.  Absolutely unAmerican.
>>
>
> The better players get athletic scholarships. That's substantial.
> Athletics are voluntary: nobody is making anyone play football. Ask players
> why they play. I think most just enjoy playing the game and the experience
> of being a varsity athlete. I'd be in favor of removing obstacles to paying
> athletes but I hardly think it's comparable to slavery.
>
>
> By the way, American football might be voluntary for the players, but it’s
> not voluntary for the taxpayers at the high school, college, and pro levels:
>
> https://www.reason.com/blog/2017/09/07/stop-subsidizing-football/
>
> I think even better than pay sharing deals would be dismantling all these
> subsidies. By the way, recall this story:
>
> http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-stadium-arms-race-snap-story.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>    Sample my latest Kindle book "Sand Trap":
> http://mybook.to/SandTrap
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20171215/7caf23d5/attachment.html>