[ExI] Bell's Inequality

Rafal Smigrodzki rafal.smigrodzki at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 00:37:48 UTC 2017

On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
> I mean that you did in fact assume MWI there, and I pointed out how.

### No Adrian, I didn't and you didn't either. I think you know that, too.


> >>
> >> A thing can have the potential to exist without actually existing.
> >> The things that give rise to that potential can exist without the end
> >> result coming into existence, and perform the necessary interference
> >> themselves, getting rid of that potential through their interactions.
> >
> > ### So potentially existing but not really existing things are according
> to
> > you capable of interference with real things?
> Not directly.  Rather, certain things X can potentially cause other
> things Y, such that it is usually said that Y "exists" when it doesn't
> yet, but X does exist, X is real, and X can cause interference.
> In this case, Y is the states themselves, and X is the conditions that
> could lead to each of the multiple states.

### So you actually say that unreal things can, "indirectly", impinge on
real things.

I rest my case.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20170101/99c1e643/attachment.html>

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list