[ExI] Gravity wave math
Tomaz Kristan
protokol2020 at gmail.com
Mon May 29 19:30:08 UTC 2017
Perhaps this equipment have to be too delicate to be reliable. I don't
know. I know however, that we have a long silence from those instruments.
As long as they are in the production phase.
Just as I've predicted, more than a year ago.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 7:11 PM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Tomaz Kristan <protokol2020 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
>> So tiny dx doesn't sound very convincing to me. The odds for an error are
>> substantial.
>>
>
> So what detail of the interferometer design have you discovered that
> makes the error bars larger than those stated in the paper? If you were
> building those two very complex interferometers how would you have made
> them differently?
>
> >
>> In other words, some fancy data about the measurement equipment
>> [...]
>>
>
> If you're going to have any hope of ever detecting gravitational waves
> you're going to need fancy
> measurement equipment
> , very fancy indeed.
>
> John K Clark
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
>
--
https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20170529/7054b928/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list