[ExI] Neural networks score higher than humans in reading and comprehension test
johnkclark at gmail.com
Tue Jan 16 22:35:27 UTC 2018
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Dylan Distasio <interzone at gmail.com> wrote:
> There is zero comprehension.
If that is true and if neural networks can can now answer questions about
what they just read better than a human can (and they can) then I don't
know what "comprehension" means,
whatever it means it can't be anything very important.
> The nets are dead behind the eyes.
If that is true then being "
dead behind the eyes
" is an advantage because it makes you more intelligent. Regardless of how
you want to spin it the fact remains that as of today a computer can answer
questions about what it just read better than a human can, and
the implications of that fact are momentous.
John K Clark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat